CQC position summary · prepared for Prestige Care Group

Six of your nine homes are rated Good — the one governance question CQC keeps asking hasn’t moved in a year

Built from the live CQC record for Prestige Care Group’s nine registered homes across the North East — the register you are personally named on as Nominated Individual at seven of them, not a generic sector read.

The 30-second read
Position6 of 7 rated homes hold Good. The seventh, Middleton Manor, is Requires improvement — up from Inadequate nine months earlier. Two homes have never been inspected.
The anchorMiddleton Manor’s Well-led rating has come back Inadequate on both of its last two assessments, September 2025 and again this June — the one key question that hasn’t moved while the rest of the home improved.
The exposureMerlin Manor was re-inspected 8 days before this note — Good overall, Safe the one question still below it. The estate’s ratings now span from 8 days old to roughly 4.5 years old.
The 30 minutesWe can see the published position across all nine homes. We can’t see what’s changed at Middleton Manor since June, or which never-inspected home CQC reaches first — that’s the call.
Book the 30-minute walkthrough

The estate’s published position

Nine homes carry your name as CQC-registered Nominated Individual, run across eight separate registered provider entities from one head office in Ingleby Barwick, Stockton-on-Tees. Every figure below is the live record on cqc.org.uk, checked 11 August 2026.

Registered homes
9
across 8 separate registered providers, one head office
Rated Good (of rated)
6 / 7
one Requires improvement; zero Outstanding
Never inspected
2
22% of the estate; the national nursing-home figure is 18.5%
Under enforcement
0
no enforcement recorded on any assessment on file
HomeProviderCurrent ratingLast rated visitWhat it means
Middleton Manor Care Centre
Darlington
Prestige Care (Middleton) Limited Requires improvement · 48% 9 Jun 2026 (63 days) Well-led rated Inadequate for the second assessment running
Merlin Manor Care Centre
Hartlepool
Prestige Care (HM) Limited Good 3 Aug 2026 (8 days) The estate’s newest rating; Safe is the one key question still below Good
Parkville & Roseville Care Centres
Middlesbrough & Ingleby Barwick
Prestige Care Ltd / Prestige Care (Roseville) Ltd Good · 74% each 19 & 22 Aug 2024 (~2.0y) All five key questions Good at both homes
Sand Banks, Yew Tree Care Centre & West Lodge
Redcar & Crook — 3 homes
3 separate registered providers All Good Feb 2022 – Feb 2023 (~3.5–4.5y) CQC’s July 2023 desk reviews found no evidence a reassessment was needed at that time
Riverdale Manor & Yew Tree Grange
Bedale & Redcar — 2 homes
Prestige Care (Riverdale) Ltd / Prestige Care (Yew Tree) Ltd Not yet rated Registered Feb 2026 (under 6 months) and May 2024 (just over 2 years) — still awaiting a first inspection
The estate’s most current test
Merlin Manor · 8 days old
against Middleton Manor’s Requires improvement, published 63 days ago — the estate’s ratings currency spans from days to years
The stuck key question
Well-led · Inadequate, twice running
Middleton Manor’s overall rating rose from Inadequate to Requires improvement between assessments; Well-led did not move

What’s changing under you

The six shifts from the guide you downloaded are the rules Riverdale Manor and Yew Tree Grange’s first inspections — and every re-assessment across the estate — will be scored against.

Judged, not scored Continuous assessment Single set of standards Local, risk-based scheduling People’s experience weighted higher Provider self-assurance data

The pattern

Middleton Manor is the only home in the estate with two consecutive Single Assessment Framework ratings on file, which makes it the clearest read on what actually moves between visits and what doesn’t.

Middleton Manor — overall score
48%
National nursing-home average
69.6%

Against 1,313 nursing homes nationally with a current Single Assessment Framework score, 29.7% of which rate below Good.

Key questionMiddleton Manor, Jun 2026What the inspectors scored
SafeRequires improvement Infection control, involving people to manage risks, and medicines optimisation all scored 2 of 4
EffectiveRequires improvement Assessing needs, consent to care, and delivering evidence-based care all scored 2
CaringRequires improvement All five caring statements scored 2 of 4
ResponsiveRequires improvement Person-centred care and equity in experience both scored 2
Well-ledInadequate 5 of 7 scored statements at 1 of 4 — governance and shared direction & culture both carry a recorded breach

This is the second Single Assessment Framework rating running with Well-led at Inadequate — the prior assessment, published 10 September 2025, scored it the same way.

This table is most of what we’d walk through live — the 30-minute walkthrough starts from it.
Show what inspectors recorded at Middleton Manor · 2 strengths · 2 watch items
□ STRENGTH

Safeguarding (scored 3). Inspectors recorded that safeguarding systems had improved, incidents were investigated and reported to the Local Authority and CQC where applicable, and the provider worked with people and healthcare partners on what being safe meant to them.

□ STRENGTH

Workforce equality, diversity and inclusion (scored 3). The report notes an equality and diversity policy in place, with staff describing an inclusive, fair culture — for example, being able to adapt shift patterns for religious practices.

⚠ WATCH

Governance, management and sustainability (scored 1, recorded breach). The report notes shortfalls identified at the previous assessment remained at this one, action plans were not effective, and audits were either ineffective or insufficient to identify the issues inspectors found.

⚠ WATCH

Freedom to speak up (scored 1). Inspectors recorded that the provider had not displayed the Inadequate rating from the previous assessment on its website as legally required, and a relative said they had only recently discovered the home had been in special measures.

The honest blind spot. We can see the published pattern across all nine homes, and exactly which statements kept Middleton Manor’s Well-led at Inadequate in June. What we can’t see from outside is what’s changed inside the home in the roughly nine weeks since, or how ready Riverdale Manor and Yew Tree Grange’s evidence is for the first visits CQC’s local, risk-based scheduling could call at any time. That’s the gap the call closes.

What we’d work through together

Not a homework list — the agenda for the 30 minutes.

1. What’s changed at Middleton Manor since the June assessmenttime-sensitive
2. Whether the same governance gaps sit anywhere else across the seven homes you’re named ontime-sensitive
3. Evidence readiness at Riverdale Manor and Yew Tree Grange ahead of a first visittime-sensitive
4. What kept Merlin Manor’s Safe question below Good in the estate’s newest ratingongoing
5. Bringing the three oldest ratings up to a comparable evidence standardongoing
6. One consistent way to capture governance evidence across eight registered providersongoing
Show what each item turns on
1
What’s changed at Middleton Manor since the June assessment
Depends on what the home’s own evidence shows has moved on governance and leadership since the report published.
Priority
2
Whether the same governance gaps sit anywhere else across the seven homes you’re named on
Depends on how consistently audits and action-plan follow-through are run home to home.
Priority
3
Evidence readiness at Riverdale Manor and Yew Tree Grange ahead of a first visit
Depends on what each home’s current records already cover versus assume.
Priority
4
What kept Merlin Manor’s Safe question below Good in the estate’s newest rating
Depends on the statement-level detail behind August’s report, once it’s published in full.
Ongoing
5
Bringing the three oldest ratings up to a comparable evidence standard
Depends on what’s changed at Sand Banks, Yew Tree Care Centre and West Lodge since their last rated visit.
Ongoing
6
One consistent way to capture governance evidence across eight registered providers
Depends on which systems each home actually uses day to day.
Ongoing

Inspection-ready before the inspector, across nine homes

Middleton Manor’s Well-led question and two never-inspected homes are two different clocks running on the same estate. GreenM connects fragmented evidence across a group so it reads cleanly against the quality statements, rather than assembled the week a visit is confirmed.

In 30 minutes: the six items above, narrowed to the three that matter first.

Book the 30-minute walkthrough
With Alexey Litvin, GreenM. Nothing to prepare — we bring the analysis.
Source: CQC published ratings and assessment reports, cqc.org.uk, live-verified 11 August 2026. Estate resolved by cross-referencing the CQC register (name-match on “Prestige Care”) against Companies House registered-office data — nine locations across eight separately registered providers sharing one head office (Roseville Court, Blair Avenue, Ingleby Barwick, Stockton-on-Tees); franchised or unrelated same-named entities elsewhere in England were excluded by that cross-check. National nursing-home comparison: 1,313 SAF-scored locations (cqc_full, refreshed against the live register); never-assessed share computed over 4,485 registered nursing homes nationally. This reading is drawn from the published record; it is not a prediction of any future CQC decision.